[MonikaT]

Hi,

thought you all would be interested in this.

I just saw this perfect example of why I think FFS should be provided as an option (if costs are an issue) to SRS (though I don't particularly want to argue about it) at least - if I were young, single and wealthy, it's what I would go for.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2259831/Faces-change-Amazing-time-lapse-video-captures-transsexuals-year-transformation-man-woman.html

What a difference! Imagine the starting point with as much makeup as you can, and it still wouldn't convince me. The last ones though.... no problem.

B.

While I agree that FFS (for the benefit of those who are not familiar, that is facial feminisation surgery) is probably more important than SRS (sex reassignment surgery) for those who need it, I'm not entirely sure that video was the result of FFS. I have seen a lot of such videos on YouTube, and they are almost always a series of pictures of the changes brought on by hormone therapy. I suspect the author of that article made a lot of assumptions.