Posts: 99
Threads: 26
Joined: Dec 2017
Why don't we start with bo and fore go the pm? I'm not knocking anyone or trying to start an argument i'm just asking.
If bo helps your body produce it's own estrogen and it seems almost everyone switches to it ,then why not just start out using it instead of wasting time
and money using pm ?
Posts: 261
Threads: 15
Joined: Aug 2018
(14-11-2018, 01:03 PM)happyfeet Wrote: Why don't we start with bo and fore go the pm? I'm not knocking anyone or trying to start an argument i'm just asking.
If bo helps your body produce it's own estrogen and it seems almost everyone switches to it ,then why not just start out using it instead of wasting time
and money using pm ?
I for one have started with BO and speculate no matter what degree of success i will stick with it for a year maybe even a small amount after ( its suggested to not go over a year) as long as we dont mix the 2 together we should see success at the path we choose ( on my 15th week 42.5 chest now vs 42 at start / 38 chest )
Posts: 662
Threads: 3
Joined: Apr 2016
15-11-2018, 06:19 AM
(This post was last modified: 15-11-2018, 06:20 AM by
Stevenator..)
Probably because PM promises retaining male function
and with BO there is the stated threat of major shrinkage
Sterilization, Complete Loss of Libido, and complete
feminization. Probably.
Posts: 723
Threads: 52
Joined: Dec 2014
Like Stevenator has said, because PM is weaker and allows for more control if one doesn't want to transition.
Posts: 3,089
Threads: 363
Joined: Jun 2011
That’s my view also
Pm is very controllable
Bo not
Also there has been some pretty servere cases of damage from bo in bad batch cases
X
Julie
