21-12-2013, 10:58 PM
(This post was last modified: 21-12-2013, 11:22 PM by SarahSchilling.)
That's only saying that the blood clot risks are based solely on Premarin, and that there aren't any studies to prove otherwise for PM OR other estradiols.
I just personally disagree with the premise that a lack of proof of hazards is, in itself, proof of safety. It's crazy when a person's health is at stake.
I'm not saying one is safer than the other, only that it seems reckless to proceed with either when blood clots are involved. To each their own though.
I just personally disagree with the premise that a lack of proof of hazards is, in itself, proof of safety. It's crazy when a person's health is at stake.
I'm not saying one is safer than the other, only that it seems reckless to proceed with either when blood clots are involved. To each their own though.