02-10-2012, 04:53 PM
Thanks Chris, excellent article which I fully agree with. I've personally questioned Curtis's stuff before because even from a layman's POV I can see holes in the logic.
This next bit is somewhat anecdotal, even if it is a personal anecdote, but I'm pretty convinced of the need and effectiveness of Progesterone for 'us'.
I've said many times that it is a waste of time and money in the early stages, and I stick by that, and indeed the article seems to support that view.
My PM-fuelled growth virtually stopped after about 9 months or so, and nothing I did could get it going again, as I've reported several times in the past. Back around Easter this year, after much internal debate, I bit the bullet and tried Microgest for a month or so, without being convinced it was doing anything. I took a month or so break and then started again, this time I am absolutely convinced it is working, sensitivity is up all round and there is definite rounding and fullness ( Yesterday, by chance I put on V-necked top and gave myself a shock when I looked down and realised that I could see straight down between my boobs and the top, past my bra to my stomach below - the view that every guy tries to get when he sees a girl with a low-cut top!!
)
When I put my routine pictures up a couple of weeks ago, others commented on the fullness as well http://www.breastnexus.com/showthread.php?tid=9317&page=7
BTW, I had previously worked my way through a couple of pots of topical nature-identical Prog cream with no effect - I somewhat suspect that this may be evidence that it IS necessary to have a certain amount of basic structure before Prog can contribute to the party. Whether my initial lack of response to Microgest was still a case of "too soon" or whether it was just taking time to build up to a level that could do anything, I don't know.
This next bit is somewhat anecdotal, even if it is a personal anecdote, but I'm pretty convinced of the need and effectiveness of Progesterone for 'us'.
I've said many times that it is a waste of time and money in the early stages, and I stick by that, and indeed the article seems to support that view.
My PM-fuelled growth virtually stopped after about 9 months or so, and nothing I did could get it going again, as I've reported several times in the past. Back around Easter this year, after much internal debate, I bit the bullet and tried Microgest for a month or so, without being convinced it was doing anything. I took a month or so break and then started again, this time I am absolutely convinced it is working, sensitivity is up all round and there is definite rounding and fullness ( Yesterday, by chance I put on V-necked top and gave myself a shock when I looked down and realised that I could see straight down between my boobs and the top, past my bra to my stomach below - the view that every guy tries to get when he sees a girl with a low-cut top!!
)When I put my routine pictures up a couple of weeks ago, others commented on the fullness as well http://www.breastnexus.com/showthread.php?tid=9317&page=7
BTW, I had previously worked my way through a couple of pots of topical nature-identical Prog cream with no effect - I somewhat suspect that this may be evidence that it IS necessary to have a certain amount of basic structure before Prog can contribute to the party. Whether my initial lack of response to Microgest was still a case of "too soon" or whether it was just taking time to build up to a level that could do anything, I don't know.