[bryony]

Well, I've been on PM since October 2010, and although I confess to having applied a bit of cream now and then, I haven't seriously used it yet.

There are two definite schools of thought on progesterone, one of which says that progesterone is death to NBE. I don't honestly know, but although I would love the fullness it is supposed to produce, I'm terrified of losing what I've got, so I chicken out!

The logic for NOT using it is that it doesn't get produced naturally until breasts are approaching maturity, which is at least a couple of years from the start of breast development and there is no reason for us to suppose things would be different, indeed you might reasonably expect things to take longer for us - you can't enlarge ( fill out) what you haven't grown yet!

I've been thinking about this, Pansy.

PM is supposed to help mature GGs to grow... that seemed to be the initial market... but won't they have gone through the progesterone phase? How can it be death to NBE if mature GGs can increase?

There are other sections here with such girls relating their performance, why not ask them?

Maybe if you simulate the maturity phase of PG, then stop it and go back to PM it might make a difference?

I suppose now that Julie has stopped it might be interesting to see if she continues to grow on PM alone.

On the other hand, maybe you should go through the whole puberty-adolescence simulation of 2-4 years? or however long it takes for PG to kick in.

B. (interested observer)