27-07-2011, 12:03 PM
Julie,
I think you still have it to come. As I said on another post, I've only just started to see the areola ring after 9 months and although my nipples are a little fatter than when I started ( but not longer) I don't think the areola diameter has really changed at all - look at my pictures which have a series of identical poses at 2 month intervals and I think you'll agree that although the boobs show growth the nipples/areola have hardly changed at all.
If you google "Tanner Stages" that will throw up loads of links to how breasts develop, I suspect from what you say that you are still somewhere towards the beginning of Stage 2, if that.
Andy has been trying to grow his nipples and areola for ages with, I believe, little success. Female breasts don't need big nipples until the basic structure is big enough to fulfill its basic purpose for existence, producing milk to feed a baby, so big nipples are not going to be top of the development priority list!
Pansy Mae
I think you still have it to come. As I said on another post, I've only just started to see the areola ring after 9 months and although my nipples are a little fatter than when I started ( but not longer) I don't think the areola diameter has really changed at all - look at my pictures which have a series of identical poses at 2 month intervals and I think you'll agree that although the boobs show growth the nipples/areola have hardly changed at all.
If you google "Tanner Stages" that will throw up loads of links to how breasts develop, I suspect from what you say that you are still somewhere towards the beginning of Stage 2, if that.
Andy has been trying to grow his nipples and areola for ages with, I believe, little success. Female breasts don't need big nipples until the basic structure is big enough to fulfill its basic purpose for existence, producing milk to feed a baby, so big nipples are not going to be top of the development priority list!
Pansy Mae