11-07-2015, 12:04 AM
Lotus,
For names how about:
Breasts: First and Final
or
Just Breasts Please!
Now that we have had separate forums for synthetic and herbal I find myself not ever going to the synthetic forum. I've never felt excluded or otherwise barred from that forum. It's more like 'what's the point?' I don't take synthetics nor do I have any interest in taking synthetics.
In the bigger picture I very rarely post outside of the genetic male section. It's not that I'm worried I'll be treated like a pariah by the genetic girls, it more because of the realization that I have distinctly different outlook on NBE than genetic girls. I don't have to factor in a menstrual cycle while planning my NBE regime, and my obstacles for lack of breast development is minimal estrogen levels and high testosterone levels. While we certainly can provide moral support to each other, males and females have different barriers to overcome in the pursuit of NBE.
My point in all of this is I think the argument to have a "non-transitioning" section for bio-males does have some merit. While the differences between transitioning and non-transitioning bio-males may not be as great as the differences between genetic girls and bio-males, transitioning members tend to have very different motives for pursuing NBE than non-transitioning members.
For names how about:
Breasts: First and Final
or
Just Breasts Please!

(10-07-2015, 10:40 PM)Arielle Wrote: I'm a bit late to this discussion, but it really reminds me of the Synthetic vs non-Synthetic hormone discussion of last year. I find it very sad this has come up again but I guess this cycle is going to repeat itself.
Now that we have had separate forums for synthetic and herbal I find myself not ever going to the synthetic forum. I've never felt excluded or otherwise barred from that forum. It's more like 'what's the point?' I don't take synthetics nor do I have any interest in taking synthetics.
In the bigger picture I very rarely post outside of the genetic male section. It's not that I'm worried I'll be treated like a pariah by the genetic girls, it more because of the realization that I have distinctly different outlook on NBE than genetic girls. I don't have to factor in a menstrual cycle while planning my NBE regime, and my obstacles for lack of breast development is minimal estrogen levels and high testosterone levels. While we certainly can provide moral support to each other, males and females have different barriers to overcome in the pursuit of NBE.
My point in all of this is I think the argument to have a "non-transitioning" section for bio-males does have some merit. While the differences between transitioning and non-transitioning bio-males may not be as great as the differences between genetic girls and bio-males, transitioning members tend to have very different motives for pursuing NBE than non-transitioning members.

