06-03-2015, 05:51 AM
More info:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051105000542 this one says they really don't know, and it might all be hogwash
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0018506X08001529 this one tries to take aim at GID and possible correlation with finger ratios
http://www.epjournal.net/blog/2012/04/the-2d4d-ratio-a-new-paper-points-the-finger/ this one discusses why quite a few researchers have flawed results, they started from a flawed point (or two)
A lot of the time, studies and research only seek to build on existing studies or research. Far too few do independent confirmation or original work.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051105000542 this one says they really don't know, and it might all be hogwash
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0018506X08001529 this one tries to take aim at GID and possible correlation with finger ratios
http://www.epjournal.net/blog/2012/04/the-2d4d-ratio-a-new-paper-points-the-finger/ this one discusses why quite a few researchers have flawed results, they started from a flawed point (or two)
A lot of the time, studies and research only seek to build on existing studies or research. Far too few do independent confirmation or original work.