24-02-2015, 04:00 AM
Not that we get many chemists here, so when you do get one have to pay attention to what they've shared. You don't have to be a chemist to see all the evidence/research material posted out there on the possibilities of achieving breast growth, but it sure doesn't hurt if you ARE a chemist.
But.......this is doable there's many ways to grow breasts, using phytoestrogens are only a small percentage in achieving breast growth. I'll show you why in the next post.
But.......this is doable there's many ways to grow breasts, using phytoestrogens are only a small percentage in achieving breast growth. I'll show you why in the next post.
(18-02-2012, 06:27 PM)xxd Wrote: Personally speaking I have a bachelors degree in chemistry so I can understand the research that is *there*.
(18-02-2012, 06:27 PM)xxd Wrote: I'm sure there *are* studies that go on about the relative potency of particular estrogens vs their natural counterparts but the problem with leaving it at that is that not all phytoestrogens are made equal.
Some of them are still called phytoestrogens and yet they block the activity of estrogen in the body by competitively inhibiting the natural stuff, more strongly bind the receptor sites and then having much weaker action at the receptor sites.
What you want are herbs that have estrogenic effects that *don't* inhibit existing estrogens much and *also* add to the existing effects.