25-01-2015, 02:39 AM
As I have pointed out before in a couple of my post's. Here is my measurements to date.
39.5" underbust
48 1/4 - 48 3/4. Why the varience? who know probably water or a cycle even tho I am a male.
According to most charts, that puts me at HH. LOL.... B.S. I feel good in most 40 B's, and a couple of 40 C's. So, what's up with the other 5 inches???? Evidently they don't count for much.
I think it's the fact that as a younger man, I played baseball and football all during my High School days. So, I have the broad shoulder's... I think that is most of the difference in chart versus real life. Don't know what else, other than maybe the bra maker's are just that far out of touch.
I would think the only true way is band size and displacement of actual breast. There is one company that send you shells to get correct displacement of your breast's, but the bra's are not exactly cheap. I forget the company, but wanna say "Fruit of the Loom" or someone equally name recognized in under garments.
39.5" underbust
48 1/4 - 48 3/4. Why the varience? who know probably water or a cycle even tho I am a male.
According to most charts, that puts me at HH. LOL.... B.S. I feel good in most 40 B's, and a couple of 40 C's. So, what's up with the other 5 inches???? Evidently they don't count for much.
I think it's the fact that as a younger man, I played baseball and football all during my High School days. So, I have the broad shoulder's... I think that is most of the difference in chart versus real life. Don't know what else, other than maybe the bra maker's are just that far out of touch.
I would think the only true way is band size and displacement of actual breast. There is one company that send you shells to get correct displacement of your breast's, but the bra's are not exactly cheap. I forget the company, but wanna say "Fruit of the Loom" or someone equally name recognized in under garments.