(13-09-2014, 07:28 PM)flamesabers Wrote:(13-09-2014, 10:42 AM)spanky Wrote: Flamesabres comments resonate with me. On the personal side, while he is quite clear and certain about his androgynyI, I get to a similar outcome by way of uncertainty about how far I want to go
. I also find very interesting, and credible, his observations about fighting body-type and how it may fit in to how far down the road one might decide to go. If you are over 6 feet tall, broad shouldered, etc., passing may just not be a realistic option, and androgyny or "tweenerhood" may be a more livable alternative. This view may draw fire from those who think its all one way or the other, all lingum or all yoni, or whatever, but I believe Flamesabres is on to something.
Thank you Spanky for the feedback.
I've talked with JulieTG at length about this topic but it's always good to hear another opinion on this issue.
I used to have the same view as Spanky, but now just see my height (6' 3") as a problem that has to be overcome in liberating Annie. Beware the slippery slope!
One thing that was very noticeable at SCC was the disproportionately large number of very tall gurls (and the very small stature of many of the trans-men), so may be whatever addles the fetal brain to cause the transgender condition may also affect stature. 

I, I get to a similar outcome by way of uncertainty about how far I want to go
. I also find very interesting, and credible, his observations about fighting body-type and how it may fit in to how far down the road one might decide to go. If you are over 6 feet tall, broad shouldered, etc., passing may just not be a realistic option, and androgyny or "tweenerhood" may be a more livable alternative. This view may draw fire from those who think its all one way or the other, all lingum or all yoni, or whatever, but I believe Flamesabres is on to something.