[MissC]

I hate to have to say this, Tibetan, but this comment, more than anything, shows how little you know about gender identity variation as an in-born condition. I suggest that you educate yourself in the subject area before engaging in further discussion.

I don't believe it shows any such thing. I believe it's clear from reading what she's writing that she is giving the issues some serious thought -- and sharing HER opinions... which you and your star twin are simultaneously dismissing and attacking.

Opinions are like armpits you know... everyone's got a couple of them. Opinions are subjective, not objective like facts... and she's entitled to her own. I see, thus far, none of her opinions which could be legitimately challenged on a factual basis, since it's all about feelings, which cannot be scientifically qualified. (Which, by the way, is what your suggested book also contains -- scientifically unverifiable opinions.)

Frankly, your suggestion to the contrary is rude. The discussion you and Samantha Rogers are having with tibetan113 is NOT the supportive and understanding conversation of women. You're beating her over the head.

Odd for guys who say they're women inside, I think.