23-02-2014, 07:41 AM
I'm generally with Flame on this ( and I'm one of those who have moaned about apparent lack of growth!)
However, I have a complete record of measurements above, round the max, and underband, plus each boob to the centre, and distance between nipples, taken every two months first thing in the morning going back to September 2010. Some of them go up and down a bit but realistically there is no change from 2 years ago, although I can see SHAPE changes still happening. I've also got near enough identical pictures taken at the same time as the measurements ( see my pictures thread), which say much the same thing.
The one thing I am absolutely certain of is that using bra sizes as an OBJECTIVE measure of growth is a complete waste of time. IMO getting the first one is potentially a bit hit and miss, but once you found one that you are comfortable with, then when you find it has got too small... go up a size! The numbers/letters on the label are only an approximate way ( depending on manufacturer and style ) of getting one roughly the same.
However, I have a complete record of measurements above, round the max, and underband, plus each boob to the centre, and distance between nipples, taken every two months first thing in the morning going back to September 2010. Some of them go up and down a bit but realistically there is no change from 2 years ago, although I can see SHAPE changes still happening. I've also got near enough identical pictures taken at the same time as the measurements ( see my pictures thread), which say much the same thing.
The one thing I am absolutely certain of is that using bra sizes as an OBJECTIVE measure of growth is a complete waste of time. IMO getting the first one is potentially a bit hit and miss, but once you found one that you are comfortable with, then when you find it has got too small... go up a size! The numbers/letters on the label are only an approximate way ( depending on manufacturer and style ) of getting one roughly the same.