[Kathryn051]

Hello! 

Was hoping someone could shed some light on the difference between Glandular Supplements (Swansons Ovarian/Womens Multiglandular - currently out of stock) vs Ovarian/Uterine Supplements (all contain same cold pressed bovine components - Ovary, Uterus and Fal -- e.g., Primal Being - Grassfed Beef Female Vitality Supplement). Literally looks like the same thing/process. May just be ignorant but given that Swanson is out of the womens multiglandular, can only assume a brand like Primal Being would be a good alternative!!

Background... been on Swansons Ovarian glandular for almost two months and gotten amazing results (fat redistribute, face changes, sore muscles and atrophy in all areas, plenty of reductions down below, and obvious chest growth!!) Incorporated Primal Being in month two, and saw major results with pelvic changes in tilt and what feels like the wings expanding. Quite painful at first but got milder over time. Others noticed the changes before I did. Thought had just worked out too hard!

Anyway. Hope someone could shed some light on the difference if any! Thank you all! 

[tomi66]

Wow. It's working great for you. It took me about 9 months before I started pelvic tilt. It worked very slowly for me so I switched to traditional HRT.

Back to your question. I used Transfemme for about a year and Swanson for about months, both worked well, so if things are moving along with what you have had to switch to then the processing should be similar as well as quality.

Hope everything keeps working out.

[Kathryn051]

Thank you! 

Its been working so to your point probably not best to rock the boat. 

That being said,  Transfemme looks very interesting.  Did you find it was more effective? Was trying to discern how they modified the BO to make it more potent.

[tomi66]

I don't think it's more effective. I went that route for the first year because it came with one on one support and they actually set up a progressive program for me based on my goals. It was definitely more expensive but I didn't have to build my program.

[Kathryn051]

Thats sounds great with the program being built/customized already!
Were results slow? With Swanson BO it seems to definitely help taking PG, RR, and Milk Thistle.

[tomi66]

The only thing I know that is consistent with BO is that the results are inconsistent and dependent on the person. For me BO results were slow, although relatively speaking they fell in the average category on the bell curve.