(26-08-2013, 04:39 AM)tibetan113 Wrote: [ -> ]Chris Honey,
I feel like you misunderstood much of what I wrote, perhaps I wasn't clear enough.
That would be the understatement of the year. Sorry to say, but nothing you write is, cogent or clear. Perhaps if you tried following simple rules of grammar, someone would be able to understand what you are trying to say.
(26-08-2013, 04:39 AM)tibetan113 Wrote: [ -> ]I see you too have ignored the poll (wags fingers). These sexual organs of both the male and female anatomy are intertwined with our egos, this is where traits of dominion over ones self and or others, power of any kind, and self gratification meet. You are foolish if you do not understand what I mean in my postings. Fucking EGO, period.
Ignored what polls? See the above comment as to understanding your rants.
(26-08-2013, 04:39 AM)tibetan113 Wrote: [ -> ]The "experience" is one WE feel entitled to as human beings. The longing for breasts from the type of inbetween I am talking about is not of a biological one, its from the ego, ego derived.
Proof? Oops, there is none, it's only in your mind. Well, never mind then. I guess the whole theory about influencing fetal brain development with drugs such as DES does not apply here, since you have conclusively shown the 'longing' is all from the ego, even though ego can't be demonstrated, tested, measured or verified.
(26-08-2013, 04:39 AM)tibetan113 Wrote: [ -> ]If this type of inbetween were spiritually at peace, there would be no longing for this superficial need to experience having developed breasts that belong to the female body as you are complete and whole inside and out as a functioning human being. Do you at all understand what I am talking about?
In a word: NO. I would be happy to understand if you would just start to make sense. Again, I suppose there is no need to consider that a person may feel spiritually at peace (like me) and be what you call "inbetween", since you have conclusively demonstrated your argument with actual evidence. Ooops, oh that's right you haven't proved that, so we will conveniently ignore that possibility and those people.
(26-08-2013, 04:39 AM)tibetan113 Wrote: [ -> ]Are you an inbetween? If so, can you answer this question honestly?
How does it make you feel to have breasts? What feelings do you feel? What purpose do they serve you? Cut the crap and tell the truth.
I strive to be as honest with myself and others as I possibly can be. Whether or not you feel I am honest is your problem, not mine. I feel fine having breasts. Having them now does not define me. Not having had them before (actually I did have gynecomastia growing up), did not define me then either. I like them. Why do mine have to have a purpose? What business is it of yours anyway? Which to my mind is the real question. If you're in my business, you're not taking care of yours.
(26-08-2013, 04:39 AM)tibetan113 Wrote: [ -> ]If you still don't understand what I am saying here, than I have to believe you will never understand the true perspective of a biological female and I believe many will agree with me if not most.
While I don't doubt you can find someone to agree with you (though I seriously doubt they could say exactly why they agree since it's so hard to make head nor tails of your posts), I have never purported to be anything other than male. Can I understand the avowed 'true perspective of a biological female'? Perhaps, perhaps not. Ask my female patients if I can understand their perspective. But, you will also have to define the 'true perspective of a biological female' that exists for ALL women, everywhere. This is probably as elusive a proposition as proving the existence of god. Good luck with that!
(26-08-2013, 04:39 AM)tibetan113 Wrote: [ -> ]Some are turned on by the lady boys and that's just fine. The same can be said for me, though I feel I am male /female spiritually, I will never truly understand the biological male perspective. I resented my menstrual cycle as a teen and into in my early twenties, I thought I should have been male. But I then realized, there was no purpose in that other than that ego derived part that would be fulfilled. I wasn't born in the wrong body, just had a male and female mindset and a felt little uncomfortable in my female body. So I got over it. As long as I can love who I loved and feel no shame, I'm good.
What intellectual leap of faith did you make from the previous discussion to sexual preference? And as far as that goes, to each his own, and again: What business is that of yours?
(26-08-2013, 04:39 AM)tibetan113 Wrote: [ -> ]Be whatever you want, but just know what you are TRULY and what you are TRULY not inside and out and know why is all I am saying here.
What difference does it make if I know 'why'? And, you seem to be ignoring the possibility that I may in fact know why I ended up on this path.
(26-08-2013, 04:39 AM)tibetan113 Wrote: [ -> ]PS, Sorry to burst your ego bubble, but your saying that to the girl who sees and talks to dead people. God does exist. Yep your not going to see God here on the Devil's playground. God tests all of us. If you only knew him, you would have a different view of everything, entirely. You sir, have a big ego.
Sorry to disappoint you, but you have not burst my ego bubble, though you are correct as far as that goes, I do have a big ego, at least as you seem to define it. Isn't it ironic though that you claim to talk to dead people and use that as 'proof' that god exists, and you claim I am the one with a big ego, inferring in the process that having a big ego is somehow bad. I would rather be guilty of a big ego than be counted among the sheeple.
There is no Devil, there is no god, there are no tests. They are all the stories in your mind. Change the stories, and you change your reality. I have tried during numerous, extended periods of my life to 'know god.' Each and every time, there was no god, just very flawed people purporting to "KNOW" god's "TRUE" intention. Yeah right.
Supposedly god hears every prayer, even down to the lowliest sparrow, right? Supposedly god will answer every prayer, if you believe in him, right? Do you still pray? What results have you ever gotten? Perhaps that is the ultimate definition of insanity: continuing to do the same thing over and over, while expecting different results. Those that claim to know god are delusional at best, and dangerously psychotic at worst. Consider Ted Bundy, Charles Manson and Jim Jones. How different is the Pope, or Revered Moon, or The Church of Later Day Saints from those three? Oh, I shouldn't say that about the Pope? But the last Pope obviously thought it was OK for priests to molest and irrevocably injure young boys. But aren't Popes infallible? Only according to the story in your mind. Oh yeah, and let's conveniently forget about the Inquisition, and the Salem witch trials, the massacre of Native American people in the name of Manifest Destiny, and Mayan sacrifices, and the god of the old testament that 'smote' whole peoples for what? Not being jewish? Really?
Oh wait a minute, that's not the god you believe in, you say? So it's OK to cherry pick whatever satisfies your, shall we call it EGO, in defining god? And then only YOUR definition is correct? Wow, and that's NOT the definition of 'big ego'?! Well, paint me blue and call me a Smurf! How silly could I be?!